Monthly Archives: October 2017

Since the 2008/9 financial crisis I’ve observed massive changes for this Country (UK). They are all bad.

I’m fed up of seeing fire stations converted to gyms or bars.

Tired of another police station closing every week.

Sad when another council service is axed.

Angry when the news mentions the ‘failings’ of most areas of our NHS.

It seems when these things are mentioned on news channels they ask what the NHS, the fire service, police or councils are doing and why they feel the need to make these changes and cuts, they hardly ever seem to go back to the actual cause of the issues in the first place, there is always only one single reason. Money.

Why are all the people who had nothing to do with the reason for there suddenly being no money available being punished and the very people and organisations directly responsible for the crisis being rewarded and allowed to carry on doing exactly what caused the crisis? See where i’m going here?

There used to be a police station and small magistrates court in my town, it closed a few years ago, the magistrates court disappeared all together and the police station merged/moved with another one about 10 miles away, a couple of years after that police station also closed. Now my nearest police station is 15 miles away. This situation has been repeated hundreds YES HUNDREDS of times across the country. Oh crime figures are rising you say? Hhmmm I wonder why.

There was a police federation conference recently, the home secretary was there to ‘answer’ police officers concerns. During the conference hundreds of police officers were given the opportunity to speak and/or ask questions. Every single one of them told the home secretary that they were in desperate need of more officers, more resources, better equipment, more community policing, less bureaucracy and more police stations. The home secretary insisted they were getting more money ‘in real terms’. You could see the exasperation on all of their faces, they knew from experience and doing the job every day that it was a lie.

To date not a single UK banking figure has been prosecuted for any wrong doing, not one.

Iceland as with the rest of the world had a banking crisis, it had 3 major banks, Kaupthing, Glitnir and Landsbankinn, the government let them all fail, they refused to help. They put the banking bosses on trial and jailed them, they even put the ex-prime minister on trial.

Their stock market crashed, people lost their investments, business went bankrupt. The government did help though, it helped the people not the banks. They set up a system where citizens in trouble because of the banks failings could get their debts wiped out. The government created their own bank!

Guess what, Iceland still exists and is doing quite well. Because the government didn’t borrow billions to help the banks they did not have to cut every service known to man, they still have the well run country they had before the crisis.  What they don’t have are the same corrupt fucks running the financial institutions of their country, there is also an understanding that if any banks try the same shit in the future they would be held responsible.

From wiki
The financial crisis had a serious negative impact on the Icelandic economy. The national currency fell sharply in value, foreign currency transactions were virtually suspended for weeks, and the market capitalisation of the Icelandic stock exchange fell by more than 90%. As a result of the crisis, Iceland underwent a severe economic depression; the country’s gross domestic product dropped by 10% in real terms between the third quarter of 2007 and the third quarter of 2010. A new era with positive GDP growth started in 2011, and has helped foster a gradually declining trend for the unemployment rate. The government budget deficit has declined from 9.7% of GDP in 2009 and 2010 to 0.2% of GDP in 2014; the central government gross debt-to-GDP ratio is expected to decline to less than 60% in 2018 from a maximum of 85% in 2011.

The UK  government should have let the banks fail.

Yes for 2 or 3 years it would have been a rough for some of the people but the people who would have suffered most would have been the wealthy not the average citizen. When all essential and non essential services are stopped or cut then everyone suffers, not just a few and the suffering will carry on for at least a generation instead of just a few years. We would still have all of our police stations, hospitals, doctors surgeries, fire stations, leisure centres, mental health support, street cleaners, ambulances, social services, elderly day centres, council art collections, historic buildings, disabled support, nurses, drug rehabs, well maintained roads and all of the thousands of other services and amenities that we have lost.

 

I enjoy watching ‘Educating Greater Manchester’ , a great television programme that gives us a glimpse of life in a UK secondary school. The series focuses on a different group of students each episode and we see the challenges they face, the reasons for them having issues and sometimes how they overcome them. It’s also wonderful to see real teachers at work and some of the things they have to deal with on a daily basis.

The episode I watched the other day was focused on some of the issues created by social media and the efforts of the school to deal with them.

I could not believe that smart phones are allowed in lessons. this is complete madness. One clip was of a girl trying to finish a game of something whilst the teacher was asking her to stop and listen and then complaining to the teacher and the rest of the class that she had lost the game.

There were countless shots of children snap-chatting, texting, taking pictures and checking their phones etc whilst in class. At one point one child’s phone beeped and the teacher actually said “Put your phones on silent please”!!!

I realise that children today have grown up with mobile phones and the internet but shouldn’t that be the exact reason that the phones are left at the school doors? Young people have so much less time interacting because most of the time they are staring at these devices and yet they are allowed to use them during lessons?

Pupils were googling answers to questions, in class!

There can not be any valid reason for phones to be allowed in school, I believe they are allowed simply because the backlash from students and parents would be so severe that allowing them is just the easier option.

The rule should be that you do not bring your phone to school and if you do it will be secured until you leave at the end of the day. Put a scanner on the doors as children will obviously try to get around the rule.

I had absolutely no idea that phones in school were a thing. I simply presumed they were not allowed. The fact that they are is not helping the children of this county, it’s harming them.